EL FEMINISMO INDEFECTIBLEMENTE COSIFICA A LA MUJER

VOLVIENDO A LA ESCUELITA Y VAMOS A VER A QUIÉN CABREAMOS HOY.

Es muy simple: EL FEMINISMO INDEFECTIBLEMENTE COSIFICA A LA MUJER. La libertad sexual predicada por el feminismo implica que toda mujer es libre para tener una vida sexual desordenada y exhibir su propio cuerpo. El problema es que cuando lo hace será  tratará como objeto a ser usado sin compromiso, se auto- cosifica. Igual que con los desnudos : Nadie tiene la posibilidad de colocarse como mercadería sin ser tratado como mercancía u objeto de satisfacción individual sexual.

La causa : el hombre ocupa la posición de proactivo* no por la historia y causado por las religiones sino por la selección natural biológica. El hombre no es selector. La mujer es selectora**, ella escoge y si ella huye del papal de selectora y se pone a distribuir sexo, al tener más poder de negociación, se convierte en objeto desvalorizado.

*Esto es psicología evolutiva y biología (no hablamos de homosexualidad ahora o de masturbación). El hombre es proactivo porque él busca mujer, él es quién toma la iniciativa de aparearse y las mujeres ya cuentan con eso y lo esperan de él. ***

**La mujer, al esperar y evaluar a los hombres que proactivamente adoptan esa actitud, ocupa una posición PRIVILEGIADA de inercia y selección, pues ella escoge qué machos de la competición son más aptos para generar herederos legítimos y sostener mejor su prole, dando más confort, etc. Es decir, el sexo es un bien escaso para hombre y abundante para la mujer en virtud de esos papeles. Es fácil para la mujer conseguir sexo, basta con elegir cualquiera, mientras que, para el hombre, él necesita batallar para probar ser digno de conseguir procrear con la hembra. Si ella, en esa condición privilegiada, comienza a distribuir el sexo fácilmente, se cosifica y convierte en objeto de valor de sexo fácil.

 ***HABLAMOS, SÍ ,DE FAMILIA. Lo de '' familia '' puede ser visto como sea, pero la biología siempre impera en ese sentido y la necesidad de perpetuación de la especie y de reproducción continúa independientemente del feminismo.

The Catalan dementia at large

Are you familiar with Institut Nova Història Catalán? Take a cllok a their insane historical discoveries resulting from the investigations that they carry out. This is NOT a humorous thread, but the laughs are guaranteed.

* Cristóbal Colón was, in fact, Catalan, and his real name was Joan Colom i Bertran, direct ancestor of Artur Mas (previous self-proclaimed Presidtnt and no,this is not a joke). His son, in addition, would be called Ferran, better known as ... Erasmus of Rotterdam.

* The conquest of America was carried by Catalans (the Spanish did not reach the continent until 1518 ^^). Their fleet det off from Pals (and not from Palos de la Frontera). And these are the "real" names of the main actors:

Hernán Cortés = Ferran Còrtes.

Francisco Pizarro = Francesc Pinós So i Carròs.

Diego de Almagro = Jaume d'Aragó-Dalmau.

Américo Vespucio = Aymerich Despuig.

Keep reading; the dementia goes in crescendo.

The admired Spanish literature of the time would also be Catalan. Miguel de Cervantes was actually Joan Miquel Servant, and his masterpiece, El Quixot, which would have been translated into Spanish and subsequently destroyed.

But it still does not end here ... When being persecuted by the Castilians, Joan Miquel Servant fled to England, where he continued publishing under the pseudonym of ... Shakespeare. ^^

Leonardo Da Vinci was Catalan too, of course. The mysterious Gioconda was no other than Castilian Queen ueen Isabella of Castile and the mountains in the background those of Montserrat. They are not the only dementias, but they are the funniest.

The funniest thing? The Institut Nova Història is funded wuth our tax money and has received awards from ERC and several city councils ... Nationalism is an asylum and they are completely crazy.

Los delirios de grandeza catalanes o como 1 millon y pico son idiotas

¿Conocen el Institut Nova Història Catalán? Esto va con las demenciales investigaciones históricas que llevan a cabo... No, no es un hilo humorístico, pero las risas están garantizadas.

*Cristóbal Colón era, en realidad, Catalán, y su verdadero nombre era Joan Colom i Bertran, antepasado directo de Artur Mas (no, no es coña). Su hijo, además, se llamaría Ferran, más conocido como… Erasmo de Rotterdam.

*La conquista de América fue llevada por catalanes (los españoles no llegaron al continente hasta 1518). Partieron de Pals (y no de Palos de la Frontera). Y estos son los “auténticos” nombres de los principales actores:

Hernán Cortés = Ferran Còrtes.

Francisco Pizarro = Francesc Pinós So i Carròs.

Diego de Almagro = Jaume d´Aragó-Dalmau.

Américo Vespucio = Aymerich Despuig.

Sigue leyendo; la demencia va in crescendo.

La admirada literatura española de la época sería también catalana. Miguel de Cervantes era en realidad Joan Miquel Servant, y su obra cumbre, El Quixot, que habría sido traducida al castellano y destruida posteriormente.

Pero aun no termina aquí… Al ser perseguido por los castellanos, Joan Miquel Servant huyó a Inglaterra, donde siguió publicando bajo el seudónimo de… Shakespeare.

Leonardo Da Vinci era catalán también, por supuesto. La Gioconda sería la reina Isabel de Castilla y las montañas del fondo las de Montserrat. No son las únicas demencias, pero sí las más graciosas.

¿Lo más gracioso? El Institut Nova Història es regado por dinero público y ha recibido premios de ERC y varios ayuntamientos… El nacionalismo es un manicomio y están rematadamente locos.

Catalonia : Blood is in the air

On September 5 and 6, the Catalonia Parliament, ruling in minority, pushed a referendum to severe from Spain, then blocked their own  parlamentary session’s  space for open debate and immeditaly shut down  the Parliament.
Their decision to hold a referendum was approved illegally according to pertentage of vote as required by both European rules and their own  Catalonian rules.
Then it was ratified on September 27 by only 48 % of those who had voted for the proposal but once again the Ccatalonia Parliament shut down discussion and a date was set for October First  By then their referendum was illegal already ’’ four times’’ : those two times plus a third for violating the Spanish Constitution demands that ‘’any changes be compulsorily agreed upon by the other 16 autonomical communites, and a forth time for violating a ruling against by a Supreme Court .
On October First the illegal referendum was held without any garantees,i.e. more voters that registered constituents, in some instances opaque ballots arrived first thing in the morning already pre loaded with votes, some ballots fell spilling votes all over the street, many people voted several times at will as proven by journalists , people have been filmed voting inth middle of the street, even toddlers.
Today they have declared th Unilateral Indepence from Spain, and it is bound to be a disaster because it Spain must of course respond at any price using the law: our article 155 is a copy from one present in the German constitution. The 1,5 million Catalan rebels oppose the other 6.5 million who do not want independence and want  bloodspill- much needed to gain international  sympathies: they will no doubt have it. Should they shut down airports and ports and resist their TV and media beeing intervened hey will be violently forced to. And let’s Julian Assange and  the biased ignorant media bark. They would not allow it in their owon contries and neither shall we.
Circa 1800 businesses have fled Catalonia and they will continue to flee until Spain restores Law and Order.

TWELVE HOURS INSIDE CATALONIA TV- AN EXPERIMENT CARRIED OUT BY A SPAIN JOURNAL

TWELVE HOURS INSIDE CATALONIA TV- AN EXPERIMENT CARRIED OUT BY A SPAIN JOURNAL

translated by me from https://www.elespanol.com/espana/20171022/256224867_0.html

Twelve hours in the Circus of Hatred, where Spain is like Japan

You do not need to be a genius to deduct that the pride of the so called ‘’Catalan people’’, that is, the 40% who vote independentism, rests on three pillars. The first the language. The second their Government. And the third, TV3. Catalonia, nay, Independentist Catalonia cannot be understood without one of these three elements, which is why the announcemt of the Spanish Government about taking control of two of them has been receive as a humilliation rather than a temporary change of managers.

The relation of nationalism with their language, Goverment and their television is almost carnal, hence the flourishing of the sexual metaphores  employed (rape, abuse, submission) in the Catalan in the last hours.

How much do  we all pay for TV3?

The Generalitat-autonomical government- allocated 315 million Euros in 2016 to communication policies. 81 milions went to media that publishes or broadcasts in Catalan. The rest, 234 million euros, was taken by the Catalan Corporation of Audivisual Media, which manages TV3 and Catalonia Radio. A remarkable figure. 25% of the national budget for all public televisions went to Tv3, whose staff is 2,300 people, almost double than national Mediaset and 30% more than national Atresmedia. Such luxury of  resources ( TV3 employees’s salaries is way higher tthan their counterparts in private media) has not worked however to halt the progressive decline of the jewel of the crown within Spain autonomic televisions. Being used to an undisputable leadership for years, TV3 ‘s saw its ratings declined in 2016 2017 coinciding with the escalation of the independentist movement, making it third in the ranking, behind Tele 5 and Antena 3.

Up to here, the context. From here on, the experiment. The journal EL ESPAÑOL  asked me to spenf twelve hours of my life watching TV3. The public Catalan television is called ‘’The one ours’’ in the community and within that subtle aggresiveness (as  implied that by the notion that, if a TV station is ‘’the one ours’’, there must be others that are ‘’theirs’’) lies the core of the conflict. According to nacionalist propagandists the distinction between ‘’them’’ and ‘’us’’ does not imply a judgment of value on who is better or worse but only the verification of a difference of an obvious nature, such as that between a Catalan escudella soup and a Castilian atascaburras (winter dish). Mi experience as a Catalan tells me that their distinction conceals more often than not hatred, contempt and a superiority complex. But this is just a hypothesis. So I turn on the TV an get ready to spend a day on Tv3 searching fot data to confirn or belie my prejudice.

 SPAIN IS ‘’ABROAD’’

The TV3 programming is that of an informative channel with interludes of entertainment in the form of humor and cooking programs, TV series of own production and the usual films.

Practically 60% of its broadcast time is dedicated to news and current affairs. But the percentage is misleading because also entertainment programs, such as  the ‘’Tarda Oberta’’ evening magazine or the ‘’Està passant’’ program, presented by Toni Soler, devote a great deal of time, if not all, to talking and making satire about those very same current news.

And the current affairs in TV3 are basically two: the independence process and FC Barcelona.

The TV3 news reports are in strict accordance with the style book of the Catalan Audiovisual Media Corporation. Its rules can be summarized in one: Spain should receive the same treatment as Japan, Argentina or Germany. In other words, that of a foreign country. In practice, the geographical and political frame of reference for TV3 is Catalonia and the Catalan-speaking lands. When a TV3 announcer says "our forests" is referring to the Catalan forests, never to the Galicians’, La Mancha’s or the Navarrese’s. The "fleet of the north" does not exist because to the north of Catalonia there is no sea. What does exist is "the fleet of the north of the Peninsula". Which leaves the doubt of whether the fleet is Spanish, Portuguese or Hispano-Portuguese.

In the TV3 news reports, the word ‘’national’’always refers to Catalonia. The only exceptions are the official denominations. The National Police does not raise doubts as there is no danger of confusion with the Mossos d'Esquadra. The term "central" is often avoided and replaced with "Spanish". The term "Catalan" is also omitted for local personalities (they never say "president of the Catalan Parliament" but the "president of the Parliament"). The national soccer team is always accompanied by the adjective "Spanish". It is also always remarked whether the protagonist of a given piece of news is a Catalan, when he or she is .

Monologue means debate in Catalan

Two weeks ago, politician and writer Joan López Alegre and political scientist Nacho Martín Blanco announced in an article published in El Pais that ‘’they were not going to take part again in any other debates on TV3 or Catalonia Ràdio, where they were usual guests. The article was titled ‘’Goodbye to the circus of hatred’’ and the sub headline  read "Our presence in TV3 and Catalunya Ràdio is harmful, it only serves them as an alibi."

Debates are the star on TV3. Although to call debate what I saw in the program Els Matins, presented by the journalist Lídia Heredia, or in the already mentioned Tarda Oberta, is a curious subversion of the original concept. Many Catalans take pride in -and use as proof of their exquisite civic and intellectual superiority compare to the rest of the Spaniards -the calm and meekness with which they carry on the debates on TV3 compared to the bawling pot of boors and vulgarities usually seen in national TV talk shows such La Sexta, Antena 3 or Tele 5. In reality, the placidity with which the TV talk shows take place is due to a single reason. In them, everyone agrees.

 ( Picture showing the moment a TV3 journalist  burned the Spanish Constitution)

On the first of the debates I see four guests. Gemma Ubasart, professor of political science at the University of Gerona; Ferran Espada, journalist of the newspaper El Punt Avui; Marcos Pardeiro, journalist of La Razón; and Esther Vera, director of the newspaper Ara. Only Pardeiro dares to disagree once in a while , always with the submissive tone of he who knows to be part of a minority.

The talk is a fanciful delirium from beginning to end. It threatens Spain with the economic ruin of the Spanish state, speaks of pacifist ‘’political prisoners’’ turns reality upise down to fit a preexisting and immovable speech. Puigdemont's reluctance to declare independence is interpreted as a personal and political sacrifice aimed at disentangling the conflict from the intolerant Spanish Government. No word of the flight of companies, which is blamed on the pressures of the Spanish Government. Neither the breakdown of coexistence among Catalans or the total lack of international support.

On the contrary, Rajoy's attitude is analyzed as a surrender to the most extreme sector of his electorate. Pardeiro tries to introduce a wisp of wisdom into the delirious analysis and opts to systematically defend the reasoning closest to a hypothetical common ground between independence and constitutionalism, but all is in vain. The rest of the compatriots do not want common grounds but absolute truths. The attitude of the state government is seen as a willingness to humiliate the Catalans while the recent kidnapping and shut down by the Catalans of their own Parliament in the last few weeks to consequently silence their own opposition that represents more than half of the Catalans is not even mentioned.

Four-zero

If in this first debate the proportion of nationalists and Spaniards was 3 to 1, in the following it is 4 to 0. The tertulians are Josep Pagès, professor of constitutional law of the UAB; Xavier Arbós, professor of constitutional law at the UAB; Berta Barbet, political scientist; and Jordi Nieva, professor of procedural law at the UB. The tone is the same. The penal type applied to ‘The Jordis’’ is anachronistic. The 155 can only be applied within the limits of the Catalan Statute (an irony within the reach of any student of the first course of law: if one has resorted to 155 it is precisely because the Catalan Government has disobeyed its own Statute). It also mentions a hypothetical abusive use of the Law and affirms that it is incontestable that on October 1 was voted yes to independence won. No one, indeed, answers the delirious statement.

Coverage by TV3 of the latest Diada

An economic analyst appears on the scene. In the world of finance, he says, ‘’there is agitation, but no alarm or sinking’’. Nothing bad happens here. The stock exchange oscilates little. After Puigdemont’s reply to Rajoy, of course, not a bit. A little more with Rajoy's. The message is obvious. Markets react calmly when the speaker dialogant  Puigdemont and with concern when the speaker is the fascist Rajoy. The four have stated a bit earlier that senior European officials have remained "within the script" as they refused any support for independence. Again, the message is obvious. The European leaders obey the slogans of the Spanish Government but, if they were free to give their opinion, then the Catalan government would be right. The news will be well received at the Moncloa Palace. In Europe Rajoy’s will is done. Merkel, Tajani, Macron and Juncker are mere puppets.

In the afternoon, the same but different

There are differences between the morning and afternoon gatherings on TV3. Whereas in the morning the tertulians are professors, journalists and political scientists, those in the afternoon are jack of all trades and you get to hear everything, from the lastest ruckus of a youtuber to  tax  scales. The tone is more partying and much less stiff-lipped. It is the turn for the Empar Moliners, the Bernat Dedéus and even the exjudge juez Elpidio José Silva, who brings a pinch of academicism in a debate that, in tone and depth of analysis, is not far from that of Women and Men and Vice versa.

Elpidio José Silva, who was sentenced to seventeen and a half years' imprisonment by the Civil and Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice in Madrid for an offense of prevarication and two against individual freedom, servrs  the inaugural service. After a report in the type of ‘’You could also be influencer, too’’ Elpidio affirms with all forcefulness and without a hint of doubt that the court that has judged the Jordis is incompetent and that both are innocent. Phhilosopher Dedéu is the punk of the talk and the only one that uses expressions like "se'ls en fot" (translatable by "don’t give a fuck"). Dedéu also says that the Catalans have humiliated the Spanish government. An affirmation that confirms the second difference between the morning and afternoon gatherings. In the morning it is the Spanish government that humiliates the Catalans. In the evenings, it is the Catalans who humiliate the Spanish government.

In general, the tone is sentimental with an extreme emotionality, more typical of individuals less accustomed to the rule of law than citizens of a mature democracy. Empar Moliner, TV3’s official hysterical human, stares at camera and addresses the relatives of ‘’The Jordis’’. " Know that everyone everywhere, on the subway, n the streets,in the streetcars, has a shrunken heart when they talk about ‘’The Jordis." And she adds: "Also the non-independentist". Alarmed, I look at my heart to see if it has shrunk but it remains just as small and charred as ever (I am Spanish so I have no feelings). I guess I must be the exception that confirms her rule?

Forty-five minutes before the evening news, the presenter and producer Toni Soler does the initial monologue of his program Està passant, a satirical bulletin in which also appears Òscar Andreu and Jair Domínguez. Soler tells four jokes. The first is about the ugliness of the Catholic Monarchs. The second is bit juicier. If Melania Trump had a double, as speculated by the press of her country, the first lady would use it in the scenes of risk. That is, when Donald Trump wants to fuck her. The third alludes to the theoretical pressures on the part of the Government and the King so that SEAT Cars moves its production line to Madrid. "Dare say now that the King does not work" says Soler, who adds: "The new model of SEAT will be the SEAT 155". The fourth joke is the most subtle: "Enric Millo is still a delegate of the Government in Catalonia."

I've been watching TV3 for twelve hours and the non-nationalist Catalans still do not appear in ‘’The One Ours’’ . Maybe because ‘’ours’’ is not so ours but rather theirs? That of a few who have not stopped alluding to ‘’the Catalans’’ when they really wanted to say the ‘’independendist Catalans’’ and have but ignored, despised and silenced the remaining 60% of their country. But yes: always peacefully and homely.

¿Cuál es el origen de la hispanofobia que tienen los catalanes?

Y también de su prepotencia,creyéndose seres superiores a los españoles.Cada vez que abre la boca un barretinado siempre deja caer una descalificación a los españoles o a España. Viene de tiempo atrás. Hay ejemplos gráficos de adoctrinamiento en los colegios,en Google están. Desde parvulitos le meten la indepandencia en la cabeza, normal que salga lo que salga.La conclusión es que la educación catalana no educa, fabrica tontos útiles de la política.

Cierto que muchos españoles critican a los indepes en defensa propia,asqueados de soportar mentiras, pero no a lo catalán en general. El problema es que el porcentaje de indepes crece por momentos, es lo que tiene que las instituciones adoctrinen a la población en los colegios y en la televisión. Los catalanes están siguiendo los principios de la propaganda nazi y a menos que tengas el cerebro lavado por el independentismo se ven muchas similitudes.

Todos los indepes,o casi todos sí que tienen hispanofobia, insultando siempre a lo español ,incluso desde la instituciones.Se creen superiores a los españoles y a los catalanes no indepes,a los que no consideran catalanes,sino inadaptados.

Hace 300 años apostaron al caballo perdedor, ellos querían un rey catalán -sí, esos republicanos de hoy- metido en la casa de Austria pero salió un Borbón. El carlismo, básicamente. Se da en 2º de Bachiller.

Luego, con el paso del tiempo han ido inventando su propia historia y ahora se la han vendido a cuatro indocumentados, que se creen todo lo que les cuentan. Es lo que tiene ceder las competencias de educación, son 35 años de adoctrinamiento basado en mentiras históricas.

Fue una guerra dinástica.Catalunya nunca fue un estado propio. Primero fue un condado de Aragón y después de unirse los reyes católicos, parte de España.Todo lo demás son manipulaciones del ministerio de la mentira catalán.

Los catalanes tienen asco a España porque sólo la conocen según lo que dice TV3.Que se den una vuelta por la España real sin sesgos ideológicos y se les pasarán los prejuicios.A los políticos de mierda como Mas les interesa incitar el odio para conseguir sus objetivos, robar impunemente a las bases de plebe seducidas por la doctrina.

LA OTRA RADICALIZACIÓN, UNA EVITADA POR LOS MEDIOS DE COMUNICACIÓN

Los principales medios de comunicación están mucho más dispuestos a hablar de la radicalización yihadista de los jóvenes que de la pedofilia y el satanismo, que también llevan al dolor , la sangre y el asesinato.

Los estudios internacionales concluyen que ver pornografía hardcore, snuff y gore movies tiene un efecto devastador en el cerebro de niños y adolescentes. Los hace criminales. Sin embargo, sucede incondicionalmente, Internet está aquí para quedarse.

Según el FBI. Cada noche, 800,000 pedófilos estadounidenses se conectan a Internet para intercambiar archivos de abuso infantil comenzando con bebés. Todos esos criminales no pueden ser puestos en la cárcel.

Europol. Cada año desaparecen 500.000 niños en Europa. Uno puede imaginar lo que les sucede ya que nunca vuelven a aparecer, aunque 500.000 constituyen anualmente un duodécimo del Holocausto.

Los padres no pueden controlar lo que sus hijos ven. Pero el criadero de terroristas es muy activo y efectivo. Las ciudades atacadas dicen que no tienen miedo, por supuesto que lo tienen y deben tenerlo porque la causa raíz del contagio, sea a través de la red normal o de la Dark Web, no puede ser interrumpida. Los líderes surgen. Los seres humanos se están volviendo sangrientos, es su último recurso para obtener placer enfermo, se están animalizando, es una regresión.

Los medios de comunicación, ocasionalmente, sugieren que las fuerzas oscuras permiten o incluso provocan ataques yihadistas. Pero usted nunca leerá ni oirá hablar del satanismo o de la pedofilia: los que se atreven a plantear el tema se silencian de varias maneras. Se puede leer cómo los musulmanes por la naturaleza de su credo son más propensos al contagio, pero ¿qué pasa con los satanistas y los pedófilos? Independientemente de su religión nativa o de la ausencia de alguna, también constituyen una religión. Tienen rituales y un sentido de comunión con las entidades del mal. Las negaciones de los científicos no pueden parar ni curar esto. Al igual que con los placebos, la ciencia no importa nada.

Uno debe tener miedo, tener mucho miedo. Hace menos de dos días un chico que es un ángel me contó cómo su padre le puso una pistola en la cabeza y le ordenó que se fuera de casa. ¡A los dieciséis años! Este tipo es un ángel, su padre es un hijo de puta. No revelaré qué país, pero creo que todos podemos adivinarlo. La violencia cometida por ISIS es sólo física y sangrienta, pero hay otro tipo de violencia cruel, psicológica, intangible, una alarmante falta de amor y empatía. Podemos presenciar esto en chats todos los días. Descontando las bromas de las "putas de la atención" y de los "trolls", alguien dice que "estoy deprimido" y otro responde "mátate, eres un inútil, que te jodan".

Esto, por supuesto, puede ser explotado políticamente, pero no voy a entrar en eso ahora.

THE OTHER RADICALIZATION, ONE THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA AVOIDS.

THE OTHER RADICALIZATION, ONE THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA AVOIDS.
The main stream media is much more willing to talk about the jihadist radicalization of youngsters than about paedophilia and satanism, both of which equally lead to blood pain and murder.
International studies conclude that watching hard core porn, snuff and gore movies has a devastating effect in the brain of children and adolescents. It makes them criminals. Yet it happens incontrollably, internet is here to stay.
According to the FBI.  Every night 800,000 US paedophiles connect on the internet to exchange child abuse files beginning with babies. All those criminals simply can’t be put all in jail.
Europol. Every year 500,000 children disappear in Europe. One can imagine what happens to them since they never appear again, even though 500,000 is a twelfth of the Holocaust every year.
Parents can’t control what their children watch. However the hatchery for terrorists is very active and effective. Cities attacked say they are not afraid, of course they are and they should be, because the root cause of contagion from both the regular and the dark web cannot be interrupted. Leaders ensued. Humans are becoming bloody, their latest trick for sick pleasure, they are getting animalized, it is a regression.
The media, ocassionally, suggests that dark forces permit or even cause jihadist attacks. But you will never read or hear about Satanism or paedophilia: those who dare bring up the subject are silenced via various ways. One may read how Muslims by the nature of their creed are more prone to contagion, but how about satanists and paedophiles? Regardless of their native religion or lack thereof, they constitute a religion too. They have rituals and a sense of communion with evil entities. Scientific refutals cannot halt or cure this. Like with placebos, science matters nothing.
One should be afraid, be very afraid. Less than two days ago a fiend told me how his father put a gun to his head and order him to leave. At the age of sixteen! This guy is an angel, his father a son of a bitch. I won’t reveal from what country but I think we can all guess it. The violence commited by ISIS is only physical and bloody, but there is another kind of cruel, psychological, intangible violence, an alarming lack of love and empathy. We can witness this on chats every day. Discounting the jokes from ‘’attention whores’’ and ‘’trolls’’, someone says ‘’I am depressed’’ and another responds “Kill yourself, you are worthless,fuck you”.
This can, of course, be politically exploited but I will not get in there now.

The Barcelona attack

The Barcelona attack

Some Spanish TV trying to say blame the attacks on ‘unemployment that Muslims suffer due to discrimination’’.

Bullshit, that is fake/desingenuous leftism: they used to do the same to explain higher crime rates amongst blacks. However money may be indeed involved. In the San Bernardino attack, Syed Rizwan Farook had just recently named his wife universal heiress of a sum of money paid to him by whom? These are not even religion hate crimes, ISIS is using mercenaries and I hope authorities investigate and find a way to invalidate sudden heritages.

The moment the Barcelona terror became news a clear idea came to my mind: that Trump would not condemn it because that is what the media would expect him to and because he does not want to pick on friends od neonazis. Yes, you read it right, I am not crazy. I’ll explain why later. Actually Trump did condemn the attack but he did not mention Muslims. Being antisemitic is the nexus and one condition that links all terrorrists, be that islamic extremists or nazis. Neither group like being on the other’s way to hate Israel. Given how Trump has treated the Muslims, isn’t it strange that no terror attacks have ocurred during his presidency? So I was taken aback yesterday when I watched the Rabi who blessed Trump’s inauguration say that ‘’While he was disappointed in Trump’s being apologetical of neonazis,he still thanked Trump for going and telling the Arabs to be friendlier to Jews and condemn Iran because, unlike Arabs, Iran was not only still denying the Holocaust but was the number one Holocaust denier in the World’’. None of the terror attacks in Europe can be blamed on Iran, not even the Charlie Hebdo. Birds of a feather flock together. You won’t see Trump nor neonazis condemn Islamic terrorists by name, they hate only the Jews. As for Trump, ha hates whoever hates him and cares only for money.

Luisa Ortega and inconditional Trump supporters

When you inconditionally support someone who has become radicalized you become a traitor to the original noble idea. This is what happened to Luisa Ortega in Venezuela and also to Trump supporters. You see those folks wrapped in the American flag calling Congress a swamp and wishing they could by-pass it to impose their ideas with total disregard to senators and congressmen elected by the American people. In the case of Luisa Ortega, now banned as Attorney General, she was a convinced chavista all the way to his dubious end*. There is a point beyond which you become a traitor to the original ideals. Even when Chavez could no longer be called a democrat she stood behind Chavez with her torch, willing to burn the place. Now she got burnt. Am I sorry for her? Not really. If you ask her, or -in the US- Flynn, or Reince Priebus or Sacaramucci, they would blame it on the swamp (democracy) not on their standing behind the wrong people and the wrong idea. The will never be sorry for what they did or admit to have contributed themselves to the current situation. Before Luisa Ortega was Lina Ron, a female version of Chavez, an hyper-agressive alcohol and drug abuser, who used to sream ‘’With Chavez all the way to hell’’ and in hell she rots –I hope- after Chavez jailed her and she died physically. Ortegas’ death is not physical … yet.

* There is ample evidence that charismatic Chavez was removed by Castro regime while in the hospital to be replaced by Maduro, who was educated and formed in Cuba to conform to Fidel Castro’s ideals of expansion along with Brazil’s Jose Ignacio Lula da Silva and Argentina’s Cristina Kischner rather than follow Chavez limited unification with Colombia (the Gran Colombia). There is an audio from anonymous featuring high ranking Cuban military and Raul Castro plotting exactly that - Skip the presentation until minute 3.22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR7y0RQXhHI- Chavez was embalmed but no one ever has seen his corpse despite the mausoleum they planned to exhibit him at,  and those who approached the casket saw a wax figure.

You can't fight Bashar al-Asad without helping ISIS

Hitler was Satan. His aides were the SS. They worked together to fuck the world. The enemies  of both knew whom to fight

Bashar al-Asad is Hitler and ISIS are the SS. Their fighting each other fucks the world. They both hold innocent civilians as hostages and kill them slowly so their enemies and allies can’t choose to help either one.
Putin, Iran Hezbolah and China have it clear, they’ll help Bashar Háfez al-Ásad.
Putin is familiar with this type of situation, after all he  sacrificed by poisoning 170 innocent people to save 850 hostages when 50 Islamist Chechens  took the Moscow Theater on 23 October 2002. While physicians in Moscow condemned the refusal to disclose the identity of the gas even as people agonized, both the US and UK justified Putin’s decision.

Does the world know now why ruthless dictators rise and what is the root cause?
Do Trump voters know Putin threatened with World World III if Obama stopped Bashar al-Asad Do Trump voters know Trump told Obama twelve times not to intervene to stop Bashar al-Asad ‘s atrocities?
Do Trump voters realize what a blabber their idol is?
Does the world understand why ruthless dictators like Saddan Hussein, Gaddafi and Bashar al-Asad  will  always rise in the Middle Eastand, what the root cause is?


https://theretiredgoblin.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/assad-al-bashar-syria.jpg?w=467

Global Yihad and what it may mean

A terror attack today and the mediatic birth of a neologism. Global Yihad
Good luck fate or a forged coincidence is throwing a life line to the deteriorated image of the USA and Europe embracing the russian bear, Putin. Russia suffered a massacre today, a small but bloody one, by no means comparable to the ones they have caused in Syria while attacking rebels who opossed the Syrian regime. Russia ha barely touched ISIS so I was wondering what adjective word they would use to describe today’s brutal tragedy in St Petersburg. So Russian media first used the generic word terror attack but soon went insistingly onto a new word: Global Yihad.
That is the perfect term to describe what goes on around the world and the raise of Islamophobia. Even though the greek particle phobia means fear, the media makes use and abused of it as if it meant hatred. The world’s democracies are no doubt afraid of global yihad and its root cause, strict extreme Islam. We live in a world where more and more people become agnostic or atheist but outgrowing this is a wantom for blood spill and warrior romanticism spread by videogames and lack of human values, all offered in Yihad.
This is why I say a common front against Global Yihad could easily bring together real democrats with skeptics of Putin, Trump, Marine LePen and ultraright movements in Hungary and Poland. The multicurality prone media can’t counter attack fast enough with their naive rendering of an atheist vegetarian Paradise reminding us of the Witness of Jehova pamphlet covers depiting prairies and lions and sheep laying on the shade of the trees.

Trump engaña y se engaña

Trump engaña descaradamente y se engaña.
Engaña como hace dos días negando la evidencia de la multitud cuando Obama ,eso lo retrata además al culpar a la prensa de mentir, que e slo que hace él
Se engaña creyendo que puedes imponer tu criterio ventajista en lo mercados internacionales bajo la amenaza del bullying. Nadie está obrigado a comprarte y hoy día -dijo un economista- hasta el país más tercermundista del mundo te amenaza : ‘’si quieres que te compre el producto fabrícalo aquí’’. Por ejemplo coches. Los chinos hacen al contrario, lo fabrican todo ellos y lo exportan. Si le subes el arancel, el consumidor americano lo pagará más caro.
Y ya están ahogados, no por la falta de trabajo como miente Trump, sino por los sueldos de mierda que pagan las grandes corporaciones y los magnates como Trump. ¿Han visto alguno de ellos manifestarse? La culpa no la tienen los tratados sino las leyes capitalistas sin control, leyes de las que Trump se aprovecha hasta que puede cambiárselas a otros para beneficio suyo propio, por ejemplo la evasión fiscal y el out-sourcing de trabajo.
¿Olvida esto cuando dice que hay muchos trabajadores sin empleo por culpa de que la fábricas se han ido? Claro que no, es cínico.
Por otra parte el egoísmo de Trump conlleva el peligro de la disolución de la OTAN. Creo que lo que esconde detrás del América Primero es bullying para comerciar ventajosamente con Europa.
Pero donde se engaña más es con Putin. La idea de Trump es que la OTAN ‘’para prevenir un resurgimiento alemán o una invasión rusa no tiene sentido’’, que el único nazismo moderno (no se atreve aún a decirlo) y por tanto el verdadero peligro es la invasión musulmana que trae consigo la aparición de terrorismo. Putin tiene el mismo problema, le cuesta mantener a raya a los dos millones que hay en Moscú. Creo firmemente que Putin y traficantes humanos de las ex repúblicas soviéticas han usado la guerra de Siria para debilitar a Europa llenándola de peligros, división y separacionismo -de esto se ocupan Russia Today y miles de agencias de formación de opinión en ambos continentes-, pero a lo que voy : Aunque Trump prefiere inteligentemente unirse a Putin contra el islamismo, su error es que odia a Irán y ama a Putin. Pero no se puede amar a Romeo y odiar a Julieta. Si Trump sueña que Putin le preferirá a él sobre Irán, se engaña mortalmente.
El mundo no es un país en que Trump puede hacer bullying, es un delicado equilibrio económico y nuclear donde si te equivocas estás muerto.